Students

Here is a list of CARTA anthropogeny graduate students:

mbeasley's picture
Melanie Beasley

I am interested in paleodiet and paleoecolgical reconstruction of hominins, stable isotope analysis research, bioarchaeology and California archaeology.

After learning about human evolution for the first time in 6th grade, I was hooked on analyzing skeletal material. My first archaeological projects at 16-years-old solidified my interest in anthropology and before I even set foot on my first college campus, I had already excavated in Peru and China.

I received my B.S. in Anthropology from UC-Davis in 2003 and went on to receive my M.A. in Anthropology from CSU-Chico, a nationally top-rated forensic anthropology program. At CSU-Chico I discovered my interest in the use of stable isotope analysis to reconstruct paleodiet and paleoecology. I have worked extensively on human skeletal material from Central California to reconstruct prehistoric diet using stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes to address issues of resource intensification and declines in foraging efficiency, specifically in the San Francisco Bay Area.

I currently work in Dr. Margaret Schoeninger’s Palediet Lab on fossil faunal material with the aim of reconstructing paleodiet and the paleoecology of the region where our hominin ancestors first became bipedal. Additionally, several of my projects surround the goal of gaining a better understanding of how diagenesis (alteration due to post-depositional burial environment) alters stable isotope ratios in bone and teeth.  
 

bcipolli's picture
Ben Cipollini

 I want to understand how the brain computes.  We have an extremely good idea how synapses compute, some basic ideas about how long-distance projections interact, and few general ideas about intra-columnar computation, inter-columnar interactions, and the coordination of these types of information processing.

I address these issues through studies of hemispheric asymmetry and hemispheric communication.  The corpus callosum, the major connective tract between left and right cerebral hemispheres, is the best studied long-distance projection system in the brain.  It generally connects homotopically (an area in one hemishere tends to connect to its homologue in the other hemisphere).  Therefore, studying asymmetries between the hemispheres--and their interactions across the corpus callosum--can help inform us about local processing, long-distance projections, and their interactions.

My research uses neural network modeling to tie a specific asymmetry in grey matter "horizontal" connectivity to differences in visual processing between the hemispheres.  Generally speaking, the left cerebral hemisphere (LH) shows processing advantages for small, local-level aspects of a stimulus; the right cerebral hemisphere (RH) shows advantages for larger, global/gestalt-level aspects of a stimulus.  

In my current project, I aim to show that interactions between the hemispheres, at different levels of processing, can explain behavioral data for stimuli presented at fixation, when both hemispheres are active and must collaborate to identify a stimulus.   I have incorporated interhemispheric connections and timing into the model that follows two basic principles of the corpus callosum: that early sensory areas connect with fast, sparse, topographic connections along the shared middle portion of left and right halves, and that later association areas connect with slower, more numerous, and more diffuse connections.

With this research, I hope to answer questions such as: if chimpanzee and human cerebral hemispheres are as asymmetric as each other, might the smaller brain size (and therefore smaller communication delays) mask many asymmetries in chimpanzee cognitive function?  If yes, then it is possible that some or all of the hemispheric asymmetries found in humans are not unique to humans.  If no, then we have further evidence of the importance of hemispheric asymmetry in the human phenotype.

leeladavies's picture
Leela Davies

 I work in the laboratory of Ajit Varki on the sialic acids Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc. In particular, I am interested in the suppression of Neu5Gc in the vertebrate brain, an evolutionarily conserved phenomenon that suggests Neu5Gc presence may be toxic. Humans have lost the ability to synthesize Neu5Gc since our last common ancestors with chimpanzees. If Neu5Gc is toxic to the vertebrate brain, its outright loss in humans may have implications for human brain development.

karihanson's picture
Kari Hanson

Raised on a balanced diet of nature documentaries and science fiction in the 'Decade of the Brain,' I began my career studying animal behavior and foraging ecology as an undergrad at the University of Alaska Anchorage under Dr. Gwen Lupfer-Johnson. After a harrowing field season chasing monkeys in Costa Rica and a tour of duty in search of Miocene ape fossils in Hungary, I set my sights on graduate work in comparative neuroscience. I am working with Dr. Katerina Semendeferi in the deparment of Anthropology, utilizing all non-invasive, non-destructive means to comparatively study postmortem brain tissue from all extant ape taxa, including humans, in the hopes of elucidating the means by which our species became so wonderfully strange. Specifically, my work focuses on the chemical anatomy of frontostriatal circuits and interneuron distribution in these regions, involved in decision-making and the processing of reward and punishment in social contexts. In the future, I hope to work to ensure the conservation of valuable postmortem tissues in captive and wild primates alike.

hmorgan's picture
Hope Morgan

I am a linguist researching the sub-lexical structure (i.e., phonology) of sign languages. Similar to spoken languages that use the tongue and vocal tract to create words, sign languages use configurations of the hands and face in structured, systematic, and language-specific ways. I’m interested in the composition of signs and how articulations are mapped to meanings—both in highly iconic signs (e.g., “eat”) and in fully abstract, arbitrary signs (e.g., “experience”, “international”).

Not only does sign language present linguists with the opportunity to test theories about how human language is expressed in a completely different modality, but due to the unique and varied sociocultural circumstance of how sign languages come into existence, as well as their relative youth, hypotheses about language emergence can be tested by comparing the dozens of sign languages of the world.

I am currently working on an analysis of Kenyan Sign Language (KSL), which is approximately 50 years old. KSL is a language indigenous to Kenya, borrowing only a small proportion of its vocabulary from American and British Sign Languages. My recent research reveals that this young language is even more constrained in the complexity of its phonological form than older, more mature sign languages like ASL and BSL. Paradoxically, some village sign languages that are older than KSL are highly iconic, without categorical phonological structure and with less constraint on sign complexity (see Al Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Sayyid_Bedouin_Sign_Language). Therefore, KSL appears to be adapted to a specific type of linguistic situation.

With a strong curiosity about the human adaptation for language, I hope that this research might one day lead to a better understanding of why some sign languages like KSL rapidly evolve phonological structure while others, such as village sign languages, do not.

RachelMZE's picture
Rachel Zarndt

Modern humans are expert explorers in every environment on (and off) earth. However, as a species, we are not adapted for continual habitation in every ecological niche.

When humans travel to high altitude, several physiologic responses compensate the body to gradually adjust to the reduced availability of atmospheric oxygen (hypoxia). While this acclimatization allows short sojourns to intolerable environments, no human can live for prolonged periods at extremely high altitude. Even visitors at Everest base camp are in a state of slow deterioration. However, several human populations, including highland Ethiopians, Tibetans and Andeans, have uniquely adapted over thousands of years and live quite well at moderately high altitudes (<4,300m). Several physiologic compensations are now well-known to be adaptive in these populations, although the underlying genetic basis is only now being uncovered.

My research aims to determine novel genetic pathways underlying physiologic adaptations to hypoxia through an interdisciplinary, collaborative approach. Using a unique population of hypoxia-adapted fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster), I investigate key genetic pathways underlying physiologic response of the heart during low oxygen exposure. This research is unraveling completely novel molecular interactions occurring during either acute or chronic hypoxia, and altered after multi-generational adaptation.

Further, I aim to determine the relevance of these findings to human high altitude adaptations, particularly through use of recent genetic screens and samples from Asia, South America and Africa. For lowland dwellers, findings from this research may determine whether medical intervention can alleviate symptoms in maladaptive humans who struggle to acclimatize or show signs of altitude illness.

advancedanthropogeny's picture
advanced anthropogeny