@article {308841,
	title = {Why we are not all multiregionalists now.},
	journal = {Trends Ecol Evol},
	volume = {29},
	year = {2014},
	note = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534714000470},
	month = {2014 May},
	pages = {248-51},
	abstract = {<p>Recent revelations that human genomes contain DNA introgressed through interbreeding with archaic populations outside of Africa have led to reassessments of models for the origins of our species. The fact that small portions of the DNA of recent Homo sapiens derive from ancient populations in more than one region of the world makes our origins {\textquoteright}multiregional{\textquoteright}, but does that mean that the multiregional model of modern human origins has been proved correct? The extent of archaic assimilation in living humans remains modest, and fossil evidence outside of Africa shows little sign of the long-term morphological continuity through to recent humans expected from the multiregional model. Thus, rather than multiregionalism, a recent African origin (RAO) model for modern humans is still supported by the data.</p>},
	keywords = {Animals, Biological Evolution, Gene Flow, Genetic Speciation, Genetics, Population, Hominidae, Humans, Hybridization, Genetic, Neanderthals},
	issn = {1872-8383},
	doi = {10.1016/j.tree.2014.03.001},
	url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24702983},
	author = {Stringer, Chris}
}
