@article {316844,
	title = {The prehistoric peopling of Southeast Asia},
	journal = {Science},
	volume = {361},
	year = {2018},
	month = {2018/07/06},
	pages = {88},
	abstract = {<p>The past movements and peopling of Southeast Asia have been poorly represented in ancient DNA studies (see the Perspective by Bellwood). Lipson et al. generated sequences from people inhabiting Southeast Asia from about 1700 to 4100 years ago. Screening of more than a hundred individuals from five sites yielded ancient DNA from 18 individuals. Comparisons with present-day populations suggest two waves of mixing between resident populations. The first mix was between local hunter-gatherers and incoming farmers associated with the Neolithic spreading from South China. A second event resulted in an additional pulse of genetic material from China to Southeast Asia associated with a Bronze Age migration. McColl et al. sequenced 26 ancient genomes from Southeast Asia and Japan spanning from the late Neolithic to the Iron Age. They found that present-day populations are the result of mixing among four ancient populations, including multiple waves of genetic material from more northern East Asian populations.Science, this issue p. 92, p. 88; see also p. 31The human occupation history of Southeast Asia (SEA) remains heavily debated. Current evidence suggests that SEA was occupied by H{\`o}ab{\`\i}nhian hunter-gatherers until ~4000 years ago, when farming economies developed and expanded, restricting foraging groups to remote habitats. Some argue that agricultural development was indigenous; others favor the {\textquotedblleft}two-layer{\textquotedblright} hypothesis that posits a southward expansion of farmers giving rise to present-day Southeast Asian genetic diversity. By sequencing 26 ancient human genomes (25 from SEA, 1 Japanese Jomon), we show that neither interpretation fits the complexity of Southeast Asian history: Both H{\`o}ab{\`\i}nhian hunter-gatherers and East Asian farmers contributed to current Southeast Asian diversity, with further migrations affecting island SEA and Vietnam. Our results help resolve one of the long-standing controversies in Southeast Asian prehistory.</p>
},
	doi = {10.1126/science.aat3628},
	url = {http://science.sciencemag.org/content/361/6397/88.full},
	author = {McColl, Hugh and Racimo, Fernando and Vinner, Lasse and Demeter, Fabrice and Gakuhari, Takashi and Moreno-Mayar, J. V{\'\i}ctor and van Driem, George and Gram Wilken, Uffe and Seguin-Orlando, Andaine and de la Fuente Castro, Constanza and Wasef, Sally and Shoocongdej, Rasmi and Souksavatdy, Viengkeo and Sayavongkhamdy, Thongsa and Saidin, Mohd Mokhtar and Allentoft, Morten E. and Sato, Takehiro and Malaspinas, Anna-Sapfo and Aghakhanian, Farhang A. and Korneliussen, Thorfinn and Prohaska, Ana and Margaryan, Ashot and de Barros Damgaard, Peter and Kaewsutthi, Supannee and Lertrit, Patcharee and Nguyen, Thi Mai Huong and Hung, Hsiao-chun and Minh Tran, Thi and Nghia Truong, Huu and Nguyen, Giang Hai and Shahidan, Shaiful and Wiradnyana, Ketut and Matsumae, Hiromi and Shigehara, Nobuo and Yoneda, Minoru and Ishida, Hajime and Masuyama, Tadayuki and Yamada, Yasuhiro and Tajima, Atsushi and Shibata, Hiroki and Toyoda, Atsushi and Hanihara, Tsunehiko and Nakagome, Shigeki and Devi{\`e}se, Thibaut and Bacon, Anne-Marie and Duringer, Philippe and Ponche, Jean-Luc and Shackelford, Laura and Patole-Edoumba, Elise and Nguyen, Anh Tuan and Bellina-Pryce, B{\'e}r{\'e}nice and Galipaud, Jean-Christophe and Kinaston, Rebecca and Buckley, Hallie and Pottier, Christophe and Rasmussen, Simon and Higham, Tom and Foley, Robert A. and Lahr, Marta Miraz{\'o}n and Orlando, Ludovic and Sikora, Martin and Phipps, Maude E. and Oota, Hiroki and Higham, Charles and Lambert, David M. and Willerslev, Eske}
}
