@article {328957,
	title = {Human origins in Southern African palaeo-wetlands? Strong claims from weak evidence},
	journal = {Journal of Archaeological Science},
	volume = {130},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {105374},
	abstract = {<p>Attempts to identify a {\textquoteleft}homeland{\textquoteright} for our species from genetic data are widespread in the academic literature. However, even when putting aside the question of whether a {\textquoteleft}homeland{\textquoteright} is a useful concept, there are a number of inferential pitfalls in attempting to identify the geographic origin of a species from contemporary patterns of genetic variation. These include making strong claims from weakly informative data, treating genetic lineages as representative of populations, assuming a high degree of regional population continuity over hundreds of thousands of years, and using circumstantial observations as corroborating evidence without considering alternative hypotheses on an equal footing, or formally evaluating any hypothesis. In this commentary we review the recent publication that claims to pinpoint the origins of {\textquoteleft}modern humans{\textquoteright} to a very specific region in Africa (Chan et al., 2019), demonstrate how it fell into these inferential pitfalls, and discuss how this can be avoided.</p>
},
	keywords = {Africa, Demographic inference, Gene trees, human origins, Mitochondrial DNA},
	issn = {0305-4403},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2021.105374},
	url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440321000443},
	author = {Carina M. Schlebusch and Liisa Loog and Huw S. Groucutt and Turi King and Adam Rutherford and Chiara Barbieri and Guido Barbujani and Lounes Chikhi and Chris Stringer and Mattias Jakobsson and Anders Eriksson and Andrea Manica and Sarah A. Tishkoff and Eleanor ML. Scerri and Aylwyn Scally and Chris Brierley and Mark G. Thomas}
}
