@article {330311,
	title = {A 4.3-million-year-old Australopithecus anamensis mandible from Ileret, East Turkana, Kenya, and its paleoenvironmental context},
	journal = {Journal of Human Evolution},
	volume = {194},
	year = {2024},
	month = {2024/09/01/},
	pages = {103579},
	abstract = {<p>A hominin mandible, KNM-ER 63000, and associated vertebrate remains were recovered in 2011 from Area 40 in East Turkana, Kenya. Tephrostratigraphic and magnetostratigraphic analyses indicate that these fossils date to \&sim;4.3\&nbsp;Ma. KNM-ER 63000 consists of articulating but worn and weathered mandibular corpora, with a broken right M2 crown and alveoli preserved at other tooth positions. Despite extensive damage, KNM-ER 63000 preserves diagnostic anatomy permitting attribution to Australopithecus anamensis. It can be distinguished from Australopithecus afarensis by its strongly inclined symphyseal axis with a basally convex, \&lsquo;cut-away\&rsquo; external surface, a lateral corpus that sweeps inferomedially beneath the canine-premolar row, and alignment of the canine alveolus with the postcanine axis. KNM-ER 63000 is distinguished from Ardipithecus ramidus by its thick mandibular corpus and large M2 crown. The functional trait structure and enamel\&rsquo;s stable carbon isotopic composition of the Area 40 large-mammal community suggests an environment comparable to Kanapoi and other \&sim;4.5\&ndash;4\&nbsp;Ma eastern African sites that would have offered Au. anamensis access to both C3 and C4 food resources. With an age of \&sim;4.3\&nbsp;Ma, KNM-ER 63000 is the oldest known specimen of Au. anamensis, predating the Kanapoi and Asa Issie samples by at least \&sim;100\&nbsp;kyr. This specimen extends the known temporal range of Au. anamensis and places it in temporal overlap with fossils of Ar. ramidus from Gona, Ethiopia. The morphology of KNM-ER 63000 indicates that the reconfigured masticatory system differentiating basal hominins from the earliest australopiths existed in the narrow temporal window, if any, separating the two. The very close temporal juxtaposition of these significant morphological and adaptive differences implies that Ar. ramidus was a relative rather than a direct phyletic ancestor of earliest Australopithecus.</p>
},
	keywords = {Early hominin, hominin evolution, Paleoenvironment, Pliocene, Turkana},
	isbn = {0047-2484},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103579},
	url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248424000873},
	author = {Lewis, Jason E. and Ward, Carol V. and Kimbel, William H. and Kidney, Casey L. and Brown, Frank H. and Quinn, Rhonda L. and Rowan, John and Lazagabaster, Ignacio A. and Sanders, William J. and Leakey, Meave G. and Leakey, Louise N.}
}
