<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dyble, M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Salali, G D</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chaudhary, N</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Page, A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Smith, D</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thompson, J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinicius, L</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mace, R</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Migliano, A B</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Human behavior. Sex equality can explain the unique social structure of hunter-gatherer bands.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Animals</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cooperative Behavior</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cultural Evolution</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Female</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Male</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Models, Psychological</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sex</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social Networking</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015 May 15</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977551</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">348</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">796-8</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The social organization of mobile hunter-gatherers has several derived features, including low within-camp relatedness and fluid meta-groups. Although these features have been proposed to have provided the selective context for the evolution of human hypercooperation and cumulative culture, how such a distinctive social system may have emerged remains unclear. We present an agent-based model suggesting that, even if all individuals in a community seek to live with as many kin as possible, within-camp relatedness is reduced if men and women have equal influence in selecting camp members. Our model closely approximates observed patterns of co-residence among Agta and Mbendjele BaYaka hunter-gatherers. Our results suggest that pair-bonding and increased sex egalitarianism in human evolutionary history may have had a transformative effect on human social organization.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6236</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;http://www.sciencemag.org/content/348/6236/796.abstract&lt;/p&gt;
</style></notes><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977551?dopt=Abstract&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom1></record></records></xml>