<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laland, Kevin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Uller, Tobias</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Feldman, Marcus</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sterelny, Kim</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Müller, Gerd B</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moczek, Armin</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jablonka, Eva</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Odling-Smee, John</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wray, Gregory A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hoekstra, Hopi E</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Futuyma, Douglas J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lenski, Richard E</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mackay, Trudy F C</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Schluter, Dolph</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Strassmann, Joan E</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Does evolutionary theory need a rethink?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nature</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nature</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adaptation, Physiological</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Animals</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biological Evolution</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Developmental biology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ecosystem</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Epigenesis, Genetic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gene-Environment Interaction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Genetic Speciation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Models, Biological</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Models, Genetic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Phenotype</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reproducibility of Results</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Selection, Genetic</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014 Oct 9</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25297418</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">514</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">161-4</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;[Perspective article]&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does evolutionary theory need a rethink?&amp;nbsp;Researchers are divided over what processes should be considered fundamental.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;YES, URGENTLY &amp;mdash; Kevin Laland and colleagues&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;NO, ALL IS WELL &amp;mdash; Gregory A. Wray, Hopi E. Hoekstra and colleagues&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Yes, urgently. Without an extended evolutionary framework, the theory neglects key processes, say Kevin Laland and colleagues.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7521</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;http://www.nature.com/news/does-evolutionary-theory-need-a-rethink-1.16080&lt;/p&gt;
</style></notes><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25297418?dopt=Abstract&lt;/p&gt;
</style></custom1></record></records></xml>