<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lovejoy, C. Owen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Trinkaus, Erik</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Strength and robusticity of the Neandertal tibia</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">American Journal of Physical Anthropology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bone strength</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Diaphysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Neandertal</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tibia</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1980</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330530402</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">53</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">465–470</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Three Neandertal tibias are naturally broken at or near midshaft allowing calculation of geometrical and mechanical parameters. Comparisons are made with a sample of 15 modern human tibias using identical methods. Relative torsional and bending strengths of the Neandertal specimens were twice those of the comparative sample. Basic morphometrics of the Neandertal tibia are also included.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record></records></xml>