<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pettitt, Paul</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wood, Bernard</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">What we know and do not know after the first decade of Homo naledi</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nature Ecology and Evolution</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nature Ecology &amp; Evolution</style></short-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024/08/07</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-024-02470-0</style></url></web-urls></urls><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2397-334X</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;It has been just over 10&amp;thinsp;years since the first fossils attributed to Homo naledi were recovered from the Rising Star Cave system in South Africa&amp;rsquo;s Cradle of Humankind. The hominin fossil evidence for H. naledi displays a distinctive combination of primitive and derived morphology, yet for a time-averaged fossil sample it is remarkable for its relatively low level of variation. Thus&amp;mdash;unusually for palaeoanthropology&amp;mdash;there has been little pushback against the decision to recognize a single novel taxon for all of the material recovered from the Rising Star Cave system. However, almost everything else claimed about H. naledi&amp;mdash;its age, burial context and behaviour&amp;mdash;has been controversial. Here we examine the strength of the evidence for these claims.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record></records></xml>