Genetic utility of broadly defined bipolar schizoaffective disorder as a diagnostic concept.

Bibliographic Collection: 
MOCA Reference, APE
Publication Type: Journal Article
Authors: Hamshere, M L; Green, E K; Jones, I R; Jones, L; Moskvina, V; Kirov, G; Grozeva, D; Nikolov, I; Vukcevic, D; Caesar, S; Gordon-Smith, K; Fraser, C; Russell, E; Breen, G; St Clair, D; Collier, D A; Young, A H; Ferrier, I N; Farmer, A; McGuffin, P; Holmans, P A; Owen, M J; O'Donovan, M C; Craddock, N
Corporate Author: Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium
Year of Publication: 2009
Journal: Br J Psychiatry
Volume: 195
Issue: 1
Pagination: 23-9
Date Published: 2009 Jul
Publication Language: eng
ISSN: 1472-1465
Keywords: Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bipolar Disorder, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins, Young Adult

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric phenotypes are currently defined according to sets of descriptive criteria. Although many of these phenotypes are heritable, it would be useful to know whether any of the various diagnostic categories in current use identify cases that are particularly helpful for biological-genetic research.

AIMS: To use genome-wide genetic association data to explore the relative genetic utility of seven different descriptive operational diagnostic categories relevant to bipolar illness within a large UK case-control bipolar disorder sample.

METHOD: We analysed our previously published Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) bipolar disorder genome-wide association data-set, comprising 1868 individuals with bipolar disorder and 2938 controls genotyped for 276 122 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that met stringent criteria for genotype quality. For each SNP we performed a test of association (bipolar disorder group v. control group) and used the number of associated independent SNPs statistically significant at P<0.00001 as a metric for the overall genetic signal in the sample. We next compared this metric with that obtained using each of seven diagnostic subsets of the group with bipolar disorder: Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC): bipolar I disorder; manic disorder; bipolar II disorder; schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; DSM-IV: bipolar I disorder; bipolar II disorder; schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type.

RESULTS: The RDC schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (v. controls) stood out from the other diagnostic subsets as having a significant excess of independent association signals (P<0.003) compared with that expected in samples of the same size selected randomly from the total bipolar disorder group data-set. The strongest association in this subset of participants with bipolar disorder was at rs4818065 (P = 2.42 x 10(-7)). Biological systems implicated included gamma amniobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptors. Genes having at least one associated polymorphism at P<10(-4) included B3GALTS, A2BP1, GABRB1, AUTS2, BSN, PTPRG, GIRK2 and CDH12.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that individuals with broadly defined bipolar schizoaffective features have either a particularly strong genetic contribution or that, as a group, are genetically more homogeneous than the other phenotypes tested. The results point to the importance of using diagnostic approaches that recognise this group of individuals. Our approach can be applied to similar data-sets for other psychiatric and non-psychiatric phenotypes.

DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.061424
Alternate Journal: Br J Psychiatry