Paired Siglec receptors generate opposite inflammatory responses to a human-specific pathogen.

Bibliographic Collection: 
CARTA-Inspired Publication
Publication Type: Journal Article
Authors: Schwarz, F; Landig, CS; Siddiqui, S; Secundino, I; Olson, J; Nissi M Varki; Nizet, V; Ajit Varki
Year of Publication: 2017
Journal: EMBO J
Volume: 36
Number: 6
Pagination: 751-760
Date Published: Mar 15
Publication Language: eng
ISBN Number: 0261-4189
Accession Number: 28100677
Abstract:

Paired immune receptors display near-identical extracellular ligand-binding regions but have intracellular sequences with opposing signaling functions. While inhibitory receptors dampen cellular activation by recognizing self-associated molecules, the functions of activating counterparts are less clear. Here, we studied the inhibitory receptor Siglec-11 that shows uniquely human expression in brain microglia and engages endogenous polysialic acid to suppress inflammation. We demonstrated that the human-specific pathogen Escherichia coli K1 uses its polysialic acid capsule as a molecular mimic to engage Siglec-11 and escape killing. In contrast, engagement of the activating counterpart Siglec-16 increases elimination of bacteria. Since mice do not have paired Siglec receptors, we generated a model by replacing the inhibitory domain of mouse Siglec-E with the activating module of Siglec-16. Siglec-E16 enhanced proinflammatory cytokine expression and bacterial killing in macrophages and boosted protection against intravenous bacterial challenge. These data elucidate uniquely human interactions of a pathogen with Siglecs and support the long-standing hypothesis that activating counterparts of paired immune receptors evolved as a response to pathogen molecular mimicry of host ligands for inhibitory receptors.

Author Address:

Glycobiology Research and Training Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Glycobiology Research and Training Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Glycobiology Research and Training Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Glycobiology Research and Training Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Glycobiology Research and Training Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Glycobiology Research and Training Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA vnizet@ucsd.edu a1varki@ucsd.edu. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Glycobiology Research and Training Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA vnizet@ucsd.edu a1varki@ucsd.edu. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Export: