Skeletal Robusticity

Certainty Style Key
Hover over keys for definitions:
True   Likely   Speculative
Human Uniqueness Compared to "Great Apes": 
Absolute Difference
MOCA Topic Authors: 

Skeletal robusticity refers to the strength of a skeletal element relative to some mechanically relevant measure of body size, and is generally considered to reflect the magnitude of the mechanical loads that are habitually incurred by that element as the organism interacts with its environment. Through both genetically-mediated adaptations for functionally competent skeletal systems and through epigenetic bone modeling processes that alter the amount and distribution of bone tissue in response to mechanical stimuli, levels of skeletal robusticity serve as an important indicator of the magnitude and nature of the forces normally operating on the skeleton. Robusticity is variable across the skeleton within a single individual, between individuals in a population, between populations, and between species of hominoids, all of which reflects great variation in the magnitudes of biomechanical loads and the behaviors that produce them – variation which operates at all of these levels. Because most apes are quadrupedal in both climbing and terrestrial locomotion, and because the acceleration and deceleration of body mass during locomotion is generally a significant source of mechanical loads on the bones of the limbs involved, the bones of the fore and hind limb tend to exhibit comparable levels of robusticity (usually quantified by geometric analysis of the amount and distribution of cortical bone in the shafts of the long bones of the arm, forearm, thigh and leg). Humans depart from this pattern in having hind limb bones that are substantially more robust than those of the fore limb. This reflects the differential loading of the two limbs during bipedal locomotion, and the lack of a weight bearing role in the upper limb. The earliest members of our genus (Homo habilis sensu stricto) appear to exhibit the ape-like pattern (subequal levels of robusticity in fore and hind limbs), with the modern human pattern (more robust lower limb relative to the upper limb) emerging by about 1.6 million years ago with early African Homo erectus (H. ergaster).

Timing

Timing of appearance of the difference in the Hominin Lineage as a defined date or a lineage separation event. The point in time associated with lineage separation events may change in the future as the scientific community agrees upon better time estimates. Lineage separation events are defined in 2017 as:

  • the Last Common Ancestor (LCA) of humans and old world monkeys was 25,000 - 30,000 thousand (25 - 30 million) years ago
  • the Last Common Ancestor (LCA) of humans and chimpanzees was 6,000 - 8,000 thousand (6 - 8 million) years ago
  • the emergence of the genus Homo was 2,000 thousand (2 million) years ago
  • the Last Common Ancestor (LCA) of humans and neanderthals was 500 thousand years ago
  • the common ancestor of modern humans was 100 - 300 thousand years ago

Probable Appearance: 
2,000 thousand years ago
Related MOCA Topics
Related Topics (hover over title for reason):
Referenced By:
Title Certainty
Striding Bipedalism Speculative

References

  1. Relative limb strength and locomotion in Homo habilis., Ruff, Christopher , Am J Phys Anthropol, 2009 Jan, Volume 138, Issue 1, p.90-100, (2009)
  2. Femoral/humeral strength in early African Homo erectus., Ruff, Christopher , J Hum Evol, 2008 Mar, Volume 54, Issue 3, p.383-90, (2008)
  3. Long Bone Shaft Robusticity and Body Proportions of the Saint-Césaire 1 Châtelperronian Neanderthal, Trinkaus, Erik, Churchill Steven E., Ruff Christopher B., and Vandermeersch Bernard , Journal of Archaeological Science, Volume 26, p.753 - 773, (1999)
  4. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. III: Ontogeny., Ruff, C B., Walker A, and Trinkaus E , Am J Phys Anthropol, 1994 Jan, Volume 93, Issue 1, p.35-54, (1994)
  5. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. I: Temporal trends and mechanical interpretation., Ruff, C B., Trinkaus E, Walker A, and Larsen C S. , Am J Phys Anthropol, 1993 May, Volume 91, Issue 1, p.21-53, (1993)
  6. New approaches to structural evolution of limb bones in primates., Ruff, C B. , Folia Primatol (Basel), 1989, Volume 53, Issue 1-4, p.142-59, (1989)
  7. Strength and robusticity of the Neandertal tibia, C. Lovejoy, Owen, and Trinkaus Erik , American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Volume 53, p.465–470, (1980)
  8. Endocrine control of skeletal robusticity., Riesenfeld, A , Acta Anat (Basel), 1975, Volume 91, Issue 4, p.481-99, (1975)